Month 6 and month 12 can be compared against month 0 on one number as well as marker by marker. Executive Health Edge produces one with each of its three panels.
One number, three times a year
A 75+ biomarker panel is the right tool for deciding what to change. It is a poor tool for answering βis the whole thing working?β because seventy-five markers move in different directions and a man reading them alone will fixate on the two that went the wrong way.
The Health Quotient Score answers the second question. It is produced alongside each Executive Health Edge panel at month 0, 6, and 12 from a biometric screening (body composition, blood pressure, physical measurements) and a structured health risk assessment, combined with key lab markers into one composite figure.
What it is good for
Direction. Month 6 against month 0 on one number, before the marker-by-marker review.
Conversation. A client, a coach, and a physician can talk about one figure and then drill into the markers behind it.
Motivation without hype. It is not a promise or a ranking. It is a measured composite of your own risk factors, and it moves when the inputs move.
What it is not good for
Diagnosis. It does not replace the panel, the physician, or your own doctor. In the program it is presented as coaching information, and anything the underlying markers flag is routed to the program physician by written handoff.
How it fits the rest of the data
The wearable manages the days. The scale triggers the macro changes. The blood panel sets and resets the targets. The Health Quotient Score tells you, on one number, whether six months of all three moved you in the right direction.
This page is coaching information, not medical advice. Questions about medication, hormones, or peptides go to the program physician.